Review Quality Rating: 8 (strong) - View Quality Assessment Evidence Summary Citation: Nowak,C., & Heinrichs,N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11(3), 114-144. Simplified Quality Assessment 1. Is the research question clearly focused, describing the population, intervention, comparison and outcome(s) of interest? 2. Are appropriate criteria used to select studies to include in the review? 3. Is the search strategy comprehensive and reproducible? 4. Does the search strategy cover an adequate number of years? 5. Is the level of evidence of studies included in the review described? 6. Are included studies rigorously assessed for risk of bias/methodological quality and reported on? 7. Are the quality assessments completed in duplicate with a method for conflict resolution described? 8. Are the methods used to compare and/or combine results across studies appropriate? 9. Are study quality and level of evidence taken into consideration when interpreting the results? 10. Is the certainty of the review’s conclusions supported by the methodological approach and review findings? TOTAL SCORE: 8/10 Return to Article View Complete Quality Assessment